A series outlining my concerns with the “two-lane” approach to assessment security. In this article I explain why "open" assessments for learning are terrible pedagogy.
Seems well-enough referenced to me, on a first impression... the problem might be the gatekeeping journal editors. When I wanted to demolish deep/surface approaches to learning and the dominant figures in the field also edited all the HE learning journals, I went to over their heads to BERJ. It was a lucky strike!
Oh YES. Perhaps if I go for poststructuralist journals or something... or, demolish the whole academic publishing game and make Substack a legit source :p
Try BERJ, why not? Or another big, general education journal rather than an HE one… These are bigger issues than HE, and the people will be different. 😁
Miriam, perhaps this place might be interested in reposting your amazing pieces: https://criticalai.org/blog-feed/. In fact, some of their regular articles are shorter and non-traditional. I find this journal to be incredibly insightful and rigorous in what they publish about generative AI (and you've convinced me, in another piece, that we should spell out the term).
Don't stop doing this. Are you submitting these to journals?
I'm not... I figured they were more personal position pieces than academic journal pieces :)
Seems well-enough referenced to me, on a first impression... the problem might be the gatekeeping journal editors. When I wanted to demolish deep/surface approaches to learning and the dominant figures in the field also edited all the HE learning journals, I went to over their heads to BERJ. It was a lucky strike!
Oh YES. Perhaps if I go for poststructuralist journals or something... or, demolish the whole academic publishing game and make Substack a legit source :p
Try BERJ, why not? Or another big, general education journal rather than an HE one… These are bigger issues than HE, and the people will be different. 😁
Miriam, perhaps this place might be interested in reposting your amazing pieces: https://criticalai.org/blog-feed/. In fact, some of their regular articles are shorter and non-traditional. I find this journal to be incredibly insightful and rigorous in what they publish about generative AI (and you've convinced me, in another piece, that we should spell out the term).